Re: copy constructor not being called

Chris Uzdavinis wrote:

> base b1 = 'x'; // may generate tem****ary+copy, may not

But the copy constructor must be accessible even if the copy is elide.d.
> 
> 
> This is the reasoning behind the advice of prefering the first form of
> initialization (using parenthesis) over the second (assignment
> syntax.)
> 
It's copy initialization syntax NOT assignment.



-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]