Re: String literal as template parameter?

On Apr 15, 5:24 am, Alberto Ganesh Barbati <AlbertoBarb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Mathias Gaunard ha scritto:
>
> > On 12 avr, 20:09, Piotr Rak <piotr....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> There is proposal of 'User-defined literals'
(http://www.open-std.org/
> >> jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2378.pdf), but atleast in my
> >> understanding, it fails to provide way of doing that.
>
> > User-defined literals receive a C-string.
> > That's a fairly inefficient design, of course.
>
> User-defined literals receive either a C-string *or* a template argument
> pack. The template argument pack is easily manipulatable at compile time
> without introducing inefficiencies.

Template form ie. 'raw-form operator', is not allowed for string
literals. Otherwise my proposal wouldn't obviously make any sense...

Piotr Rak

-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]