Re: Simulating new user-defined operators

On Apr 14, 9:25 pm, Michael Aaron Safyan <michaelsaf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> Using operator% in this manner would never pass my code review, because
> this usage has absolutely nothing to do with taking the modulus of a
> value, and -- therefore -- this usage is unintuitive.

Out of interest, would any of the following code pass your review:

cout << "Hello, world." << endl;

or

string s;
....
s += "Hello, world.";

These expressions have respectively nothing to do with bit-****fting or
addition.

-Ed

-- 
(You can't go wrong with psycho-rats.)(http://mi.eng.cam.ac.uk/~er258)

/d{def}def/f{/Times s selectfont}d/s{11}d/r{roll}d f 2/m{moveto}d -1
r 230 350 m 0 1 179{ 1 index show 88 rotate 4 mul 0 rmoveto}for/s 12
     d f pop 235 420 translate 0 0 moveto 1 2 scale show showpage

      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]