Re: String literal as template parameter?

Mathias Gaunard ha scritto:
> On 12 avr, 20:09, Piotr Rak <piotr....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> There is proposal of 'User-defined literals' (http://www.open-std.org/
>> jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2378.pdf), but atleast in my
>> understanding, it fails to provide way of doing that.
> 
> User-defined literals receive a C-string.
> That's a fairly inefficient design, of course.

User-defined literals receive either a C-string *or* a template argument
pack. The template argument pack is easily manipulatable at compile time
without introducing inefficiencies.

> 
>> If yes, what are technical reasons from preventing that?
> 
> None really.
> It just seems people working on the standard are not that interested
> in compile-time computation.

Given that the template argument pack possibility is explicitly provided
by proposal, how can you say that?

Ganesh

-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]