Re: String literal as template parameter?

On Apr 14, 12:43 pm, Sean Hunt <ride...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> > I find his extension proposal to allow a string-literal
> > as an alternative argument of variadic non-type templates
> > (of character type) quite interesting. This is IMO the
> > first approach, where I would see any chance of acceptance
> > on implementors side.
>
> Yeah. This is a good idea. It doesn't take a lot of wording either:
>
> Sean Hunt
>

It is also desirable to have a way to reconstruct string literal from
variadic non-type template of character type. maybe like:

template < char ... s >
const char* a = { s };

-- 
      [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
      [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]