Consider the following code snippet:
....
class XXXX
{
public:
XXXX()
{
cout << " XXXX Constructor " << endl;
};
int i;
};
class YYYY
{
public:
YYYY()
{
cout << " YYYY Constructor " << endl;
};
int i;
class XXXX XXXX; // compiles ( g++ )
// XXXX XXXX; // does not compile
};
....
Note the declaration/definition of an instance XXXX of class XXXX in
class YYYY.
It is my contention ( and g++ seems to agree ) that such a construct
ought to be in error.
VIsual C++ and another as yet unknown compiler ( the problem occurs in
some third party code ) seem to have no trouble with the commented out
code ( XXXX XXXX; ).
What I'm looking for is material to wrap around a blunt object which I
may then use to admonish the offending third party if in fact the
situation is
as I suspect.
Thanx.
IBM
--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
