On Mar 14, 12:32 pm, hervebronnim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Thanks all for the replies. I've forwarded this post to the comp.std.c
> ++, but that moderated group isn't very active at the moment. Bo, I
> agree the lwg is relevant, but it doesn't address my point, so I think
> another LWG is warranted here.
c.s.c++ is currently broken - apparently they were having some issues
with the moderation mails that have yet to be fixed.
--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm
for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
