In article <do-E732BB.21200431102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Mac Dude <do@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <47279245$0$3810$5402220f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Anic
> <here@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
> > Joe Strout a écrit:
> > > In article <do-50D667.18353229102007@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > The Mac Dude <do@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> At any rate, the original question (about possible incompatibility
> > >> between RB 5.2.4 and Tiger) hasn't been aswered yet...
> > >
> > > Probably because nobody knows. You may be the only person still
using
> > > 5.2.4 contemplating 10.5. Perhaps you'll have to try it and let us
all
> > > know how it goes.
> >
> > There may be some reasons to keep using RB 5.x because RB2005 changed
> > too much. However, Mac OS 10.5 won't change its interface from
scratch.
>
> Actually, I wasn't asking about 10.5 (Leo), I was asking about RB 5.2.4
and
> OS X 10.4 (Tiger).
Oops, sorry, I get the big cats mixed up all the time.
There probably ARE people who have tried 5.2.4 on 10.4... but I don't
know any offhand.
Best,
- Joe
--
"Polywell" fusion -- an approach to nuclear fusion that might actually
work.
Learn more and discuss via:
<http://www.strout.net/info/science/polywell/>
|
