"MystikShadows" AKA Stephane Richard <MystikShadows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
AKA 'Ada World' webmaster ( http://www.adaworld.com
) wrote:
>> You claim to have read the thread, but you somehow either rather
>> conveniently missed the false accusation of email flooding and
>> bad language or think that it's OK to make false accusations.
>>
>Not all of it no, I just joined the group,
You claimed to have read enough to reach the following conclusion:
"Mr. Zale, Tim have behaved themselves in a way that should
be an example of how professionals should behave."
Are you in the habit of coming to conclusions without examining
the evidence? I can understand not bothering to read all 178
posts in the thread, but I would have thought that you would bother
to read at least a few of the the 17 posts from from Bob Zale or
the 6 posts from "info@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" before expressing such a
strong opinion about the contents of those posts.
>> I am trying to decide whether you are a PowerBASIC employee
>> posting under a sock-puppet pseudonym, or just someone who
>> smokes crack before posting. Could be both, of course...
>> The fact that you are posting from NNTP-Posting-Host
>> 69.205.201.142 -- the same IP address used by various
>> PowerBASIC employees -- is certainly suggestive, as is the
>> fact that a Google search for "MystikShadows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>> shows a rather suspicious fondness for deep-fried Haggis.
>>
>LOL, you should write movie scripts..I'm not affiliated with
>powerbasic in any way. I have nothing against you or frank or a
>anyone else. And no I don't do crack.
What? You deny doing Crack?? How can this be? You yourself
wrote that
"I find it quite childish and immature to use a newsgroup
such as this one (or any other for that matter) for this
kind of purpose. There are more professional means of
dealing with situations when they occur."
Yet here you are, doing exactly what you claim to be childish
and immature when others do it -- saying that publicly posted
false accusations about you are not true!
>I came from comp.lang.basic.misc, out of curiousity. I just
>think this should be dealt with outsite of here, that's all.
Until it happens to you, as it just did. When it happens to
you, all of a sudden it is OK to reply to the accusation here.
That seems rather hypocritical to me.
>> Perhaps that explains why you flooded *my* mailbox at
>> example.com with emails containing vile language, why
>> Google Groups banned *you* for life, or why you went to
>> Sarajevo and shot Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria
>> and his wife Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg.
>>
>> The above accusations are, by your own definition, a fine
>> example of me conducting myself in an exemplary fa****on, so
>> I expect you to silently let the above accusations against
>> you stand, because as a self-styled "unbiased reader of this
>> newsgroup", you have already gone on record as finding it
>> quite childish and immature to use a newsgroup such as
>> this one (or any other for that matter) for the purpose of
>> responding to these kind of publicly posted accusations.
>
>based on what is written here, on this newsgroup's "banned from.."
thread,
>this could go either way because there's no background information, or
not
>enough of it. Like I said before, I'm not here to point fingers or
>anything, I simply just don't think this is the place to settle this. And
>I've made that clear throughout all my post. it's the only message I
want
>to send here.
That's not true. When accused of being a crack addict, you came up
with a *second* message: "I am not a crack addict." Yet you call
others names when they respond to false allegations against them!
>I've said what I wanted to say, that's all I wanted to do.
>to me it's still not the place to try to settle things like this.
...unless it happens to you.
>If you feel it is the place, just do what you want to do. That's your
>business and frank's. I said my opinion here, because I have no plans
on
>continuing to read there. I started a new thread because the goal was to
>say that it wasn't the place for it, and what I know from powerbasic.
>that's all :-).
But you are willfully ignorant, refusing to read the posts from
PowerBASIC before deciding that they "have behaved themselves in
a way that should be an example of how professionals should behave."
And you know this how? By your psychic powers? Nobody that
actually bothered to read the false accusations of email flooding,
etc. could possibly come to the above conclusion.
>I didn't even really expect a reply. Jbut yeah, what you
>and frank do has nothing to do with me. I would have said
>the same thing if it woudl have been any other company in
>any other situation, I just don't think this is the place
>for it. that's all ;-)
....unless it happens to you. You are special; you and you alone
get to reply to public accusations. Everyone else has to shut up.
>they [PowerBASIC] seemed pretty open minded here thus far.
....says the man who didn't bother reading the posts where
PowerBASIC made the multiple false accusations.
>and they've shown a great deal of patience so far, again,
>here, on this forum.
....says the man who didn't bother reading the posts where
>PowerBASIC made the multiple false accusations.
>If the post was deleted at the other place, no one can
go back in time to really see every detail of what happened.
Nobody is complaining about that post being deleted, because
we can't show what it contained. We are complaining about
the posts right here in comp.lang.basic.powerbasic that are
full of lies and slander.
>It's like you made this allegation and are trying to slender
>their name
Exactly opposite from the facts.
>and their reputation here, you think they would just sit back
>and say nothing?
Looks like they are doing a great job of sitting back and saying
nothing, now that they have been caught in multiple falsehoods.
Good luck with the ongoing murder investigation fingering you
for the murder of Archduke Ferdinand, BTW. We all know that you
did it, so here's hoping that you get off on a technicality.
|
