"Olav Bergesen" <ola@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Judson McClendon" <judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Olav Bergesen" <ola@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> "Judson McClendon" <judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> "Bart Lateur" <bart.lateur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The only thing we
>>>>>>asked of our customers in return was a confirmation of their contact
>>>>>>information. Their name. Their address. Their telephone and email
>>>>>>address, so we could be certain our records were up-to-date, and
that
>>>>>>we were actually providing a new compler to a person who had
actually
>>>>>>purchased the prior version.
>>>>>
>>>>> People are not required to even have a phone. So your requirement of
>>>>> filling in a phone number is asking for false data.
>>>>
>>>> If you read Bob's comments, he said that, for online update
downloads,
>>>> the phone number was compared against the one on file. I assume from
>>>> that statement that if you did not have a phone number when you
>>>> purchased the product, and you entered none on the download page, it
>>>> would match.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, how many people do you know who download software from
>>>> the internet and do not have a phone? :-)
>>>
>>> Broadband? I'm not using any phone line for my internet connection.
>>
>> You know Olav, for a while I just thought you were only extremely rude
>> and insensitive. But now I'm beginning to think you're also stupid. I
said
>> *nothing* about using a phone line for Internet access. My point was
>> that any person who is "connected" enough to have Internet access and
>> a compiler to run a compiler on will also be "connected" enough to
>> have a phone line. I know lots of people who have Internet access
>> without a landline telephone, but all of them have cell phones or VOIP.
>>
>
> Do you really? What give you a reason to say that what goes for those
you know also applies for everone else in the world.
> What a narrow minded person you are!!
Okay Stupid, what part of "how many people do you know who download
software from the internet and do not have a phone?" do you not
understand?
Do you see the question mark? If you disagreed, you could have simply said
"Oh, I know lots of them?" or some such. Instead, you provide *no* counter
information, only useless rants. If you are correct, then *defend your
position
with facts!* If you can't defend your position, then admit you are wrong.
What you do is not only stupid, it is intellectual dishonesty.
> Better to be stupid than a ass-licking fool like yourself.
And you think comments like that commend respect?
--
Judson McClendon judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
