"Judson McClendon" <judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> skrev i melding
news:60pPi.154$m8.7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Olav Bergesen" <ola@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> "Judson McClendon" <judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> "Bart Lateur" <bart.lateur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>The only thing we
>>>>>asked of our customers in return was a confirmation of their contact
>>>>>information. Their name. Their address. Their telephone and email
>>>>>address, so we could be certain our records were up-to-date, and that
>>>>>we were actually providing a new compler to a person who had actually
>>>>>purchased the prior version.
>>>>
>>>> People are not required to even have a phone. So your requirement of
>>>> filling in a phone number is asking for false data.
>>>
>>> If you read Bob's comments, he said that, for online update downloads,
>>> the phone number was compared against the one on file. I assume from
>>> that statement that if you did not have a phone number when you
>>> purchased the product, and you entered none on the download page, it
>>> would match.
>>>
>>> Anyway, how many people do you know who download software from
>>> the internet and do not have a phone? :-)
>>
>> Broadband? I'm not using any phone line for my internet connection.
>
> You know Olav, for a while I just thought you were only extremely rude
> and insensitive. But now I'm beginning to think you're also stupid. I
said
> *nothing* about using a phone line for Internet access. My point was
> that any person who is "connected" enough to have Internet access and
> a compiler to run a compiler on will also be "connected" enough to
> have a phone line. I know lots of people who have Internet access
> without a landline telephone, but all of them have cell phones or VOIP.
>
Do you really? What give you a reason to say that what goes for those you
know also applies for everone else in the world.
What a narrow minded person you are!!
> The people reading these newsgroups only know you from what you
> write here. Up to this point, what you've written makes you look like a
> ranting childish idiot. There's no doubt that you're ranting. But if
> you're
> not a childish idiot, and do not want people to think that you are, then
> stop acting like one. For one thing, start paying attention to what
others
> have written before responding with foolish rants that obviously miss
> the point, as you did above, and have done so many times before.
> And try to make reasonable, responsive posts instead of blathering
> rants. Finally, try to use a little courtesy. If you actually tried it,
> you
> would find that people (at least people other than yourself) respond
> much better to calm, reasoned, well articulated argument that considers
> the other person's points and addresses them, than to foolish, angry
> tirades that entirely ignore the other person's valid objections.
> --
> "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
> whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Better to be stupid than a ass-licking fool like yourself.
--
OB
|
