by James Beck <jim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Oct 3, 2006 at 10:43 AM
In article <Xns9850DF4C31581somewhereouttherecom@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
somewhere@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> that was just a short example. there is code that is run between
> each for/next that is applied to the next loop or skips the next loop.
>
> if there is a better way then please do elaborate...
>
>
I think the point is that if you are nesting loops to the depth that you
are worried about running up against some compiler limitation then you
had better rethink the problem.
