Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic Misc > Re: Interpreter...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 20 of 63 Topic 1431 of 1467
Post > Topic >>

Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era

by "Auric__" <not.my.real@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 10, 2008 at 05:46 PM

On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:53:19 GMT,  wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:58:56 +0000 (UTC), "Auric__"
> <not.my.real@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>>
>>Yeah, I know, I shouldn't complain, especially after Python or 
>>whatever language it is where whitespace is important.
> Wouldn't touch such a language with a 10 foot pole.  :-)
> 
>>> <snip>
>>>>>> ... (I'm not going to d/l it to find out -- I'm on
>>>>>> v-e-e-e-e-e-r-y slow dial-up and most downloads are painful.)
>>>
>>> How slow is it?  :-)    (shades of Johnny Carson) :-)
>>
>>It's SO slow... snails yell at it to speed up as they zoom past.
>>
>>> I have been on 64k ISDN for most of the last 15 years or so.  
>>
>>I'm using AOL right now. No idea how fast it really is -- the
>>software claims 100+k but I think it's closer to 30k.
> Wouldn't touch AOL with a 100 meter pole.  :-)

I wouldn't either... except that where I spend my days, it's AOL or 
nothing... and I have no internet at home.

> Ever since the 3.0 & 3.1 days, every system that I ever saw that
> had AOL installed, was FUBARed in some manner.  It was usually
> easier to reinstall the system than to try to get rid of AOL.  :-)

I know. Believe me, I know.

> BTW, DslReports.com (I think it was) used to have a speed tester,
> If you really care about that.

Sounds right, but this connection is so slow that it's not really 
worth it to run the test.

>>DeviantArt.
>
> Reference?

http://www.deviantart.com/

Art site. When I first joined (not using this nym), it was fairly fast 
and pretty simple -- now it's bloated and complex. (Opening one page 
requires downloading a number of files -- not including graphics -- 
and can take up to a minute on my connection.)

>>Like a new kernel -- yikes again.
> I usually buy those on a CD.

I have financial issues that prevent me from doing so -- and I like to 
use the latest "stable" 2.4 kernel available. (Can't use 2.6 due to 
severe weirdness with X on my system, the nature of which I don't know 
how to track down. Works fine on the command line though.)

-- 
- Still can't kill people with angry thoughts?
- The presence of your pulse is answer enough.




 63 Posts in Topic:
Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 11:12:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Paul Bartlett <bartlet  2008-03-03 20:07:01 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
rebel <me@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-04 10:16:31 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-03 18:23:10 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
rebel <me@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-05 10:44:45 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:56:45 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-08 15:47:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-04 00:05:17 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-04 19:09:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2008-03-04 22:46:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-04 21:06:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2008-03-05 11:07:24 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-05 00:04:10 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-06 17:12:03 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-06 12:05:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-07 17:12:49 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-07 13:38:51 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-07 23:58:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-07 18:53:19 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-10 17:46:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-10 18:17:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:01:43 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-11 17:43:05 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-12 17:35:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-12 14:22:49 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-13 15:10:08 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-13 19:36:55 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-14 17:26:15 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-14 18:01:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-06 20:58:28 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Tom Lake" <  2008-03-06 16:02:16 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-06 21:26:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-06 15:25:02 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-06 16:58:58 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2008-03-08 23:33:53 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2008-03-08 23:51:54 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-06 15:16:17 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:20:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-10 17:51:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:21:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:23:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:38:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-11 12:57:35 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-12 18:06:43 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Warren Gay <snark@[EMA  2008-03-13 15:19:22 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 03:41:59 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Warren Gay <snark@[EMA  2008-03-13 15:36:05 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 11:11:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-14 15:28:29 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 22:37:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-15 04:15:36 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-16 13:10:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 16:03:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 08:41:36 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-14 15:57:50 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2008-03-18 09:11:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-18 19:52:03 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
winston19842005 <bjjly  2008-03-18 18:18:44 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2008-03-18 20:41:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"winston19842005@[EM  2008-03-18 22:13:40 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-19 15:32:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 12:35:28 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 22:37:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu May 22 14:18:18 CDT 2008.