Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic Misc > Re: Interpreter...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 63 Topic 1431 of 1467
Post > Topic >>

Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era

by thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 4, 2008 at 12:05 AM

On 4 Mrz., 02:07, Paul Bartlett <bartl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, thomas.mer...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> > I wrote a basic interpreter (bas7) which can execute old basic
> > programs from the line number era (If you know GW-Basic, that
> > was the era). The interpreter is released under the GPL.
> > A description of bas7 can be found here:
>
> >http://seed7.sourceforge.net/scrshots/bas7.htm
>
> > It would be nice to get some feedback about it.
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on old BASICs, but I did look at the
> webpage, and it seems that only a subset of GW-BASIC is implemented.
GW-BASIC was not the only standard for Bas7. I searched some
archives for old BASIC programs and included some alternative
constructs from other BASICs also. You are right that only a
subset of GW-BASIC is implemented. Although the webpage says
GW-BASIC (without graphics), Bas7 contains some support for
graphics, but it is not finished. In the near future I will work
on other things, therefore I decided to introduce what I have now.
Maybe you give it a try and tell me, what features of GW-BASIC
are missing in Bas7.
> There are a lot of old perfectly good GW-BASIC programs that would not
> run under bas7.
Especially programs that contain PEEKs, POKEs, ports and other
specialties of GW-BASIC and/or DOS.
> Also, the web page stated that "spaghetti code is very
> common in BASIC."  Although it is true that a quarter of a century ago
> there were programmers who, through lack of understanding, training,
> and discipline, wrote spaghetti code, with more modern BASICs (even as
> old as Microsoft's QuickBasic and QBasic, which have been out a number
> of years, this is not necessarily so.  I have written (as have many
> people) QuickBasic programs that print out at many pages with nary a
> GOTO in them.  Fully structured.  Even GW-BASIC could be written well
> with some discipline.
I did not want to hurt your feelings. I was referring to exactly
such old BASIC programs from a quarter of a century ago.
Many of the example programs I used for testing look very
spaghetti like.

Greetings Thomas Mertes

Seed7 Homepage:  http://seed7.sourceforge.net
Seed7 - The extensible programming language: User defined statements
and operators, abstract data types, templates without special
syntax, OO with interfaces and multiple dispatch, statically typed,
interpreted or compiled, portable, runs under linux/unix/windows.




 63 Posts in Topic:
Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-03 11:12:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Paul Bartlett <bartlet  2008-03-03 20:07:01 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
rebel <me@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-04 10:16:31 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-03 18:23:10 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
rebel <me@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-03-05 10:44:45 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:56:45 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-08 15:47:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-04 00:05:17 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-04 19:09:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2008-03-04 22:46:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"R.Nicholson" &  2008-03-04 21:06:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2008-03-05 11:07:24 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-05 00:04:10 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-06 17:12:03 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-06 12:05:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-07 17:12:49 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-07 13:38:51 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-07 23:58:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-07 18:53:19 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-10 17:46:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-10 18:17:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:01:43 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-11 17:43:05 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-12 17:35:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-12 14:22:49 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-13 15:10:08 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-13 19:36:55 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-14 17:26:15 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-14 18:01:00 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-06 20:58:28 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Tom Lake" <  2008-03-06 16:02:16 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Guy Macon <http://www.  2008-03-06 21:26:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Judson McClendon&qu  2008-03-06 15:25:02 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
ArarghMail803NOSPAM@[EMAI  2008-03-06 16:58:58 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2008-03-08 23:33:53 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2008-03-08 23:51:54 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-06 15:16:17 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:20:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-10 17:51:46 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:21:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-11 17:23:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-08 01:38:33 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-11 12:57:35 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"Auric__" <n  2008-03-12 18:06:43 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Warren Gay <snark@[EMA  2008-03-13 15:19:22 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-13 03:41:59 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Warren Gay <snark@[EMA  2008-03-13 15:36:05 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 11:11:41 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-14 15:28:29 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 22:37:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-15 04:15:36 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-16 13:10:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Thomas Dickey <dickey@  2008-03-14 16:03:56 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-14 08:41:36 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-14 15:57:50 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2008-03-18 09:11:26 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-18 19:52:03 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
winston19842005 <bjjly  2008-03-18 18:18:44 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2008-03-18 20:41:12 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
"winston19842005@[EM  2008-03-18 22:13:40 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Charmed Snark <snark@[  2008-03-19 15:32:27 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
thomas.mertes@[EMAIL PROT  2008-03-19 12:35:28 
Re: Interpreter for old basic programs from the line number era
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2008-03-19 22:37:05 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu May 22 14:08:46 CDT 2008.