On 13 Feb 2008 12:44:16 GMT, Optimus Prime wrote:
> "H-Man <I-Hate@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>
>>For a viable alternative you might consider PureBasic. It's my
>>language of choice for right now. Small and really tight executables,
Linux
>>and MAC versions, GUI designer, console progs and DLLs. Inline ASM, and
a
>>library compiler rounds out the offerings. It really is a lot of
>>development tool for the money. The PureBasic commmunity is very
>>knowlegeable and very helpful, and AFAIK no one has been axed from the
>>forums. PureBasic has been around since 1998 and has a strong following.
>>Nothing is forever but it looks to remain for a while. Please don't
>>misunderstand, I'm not dissing PowerBASIC or the products thereof, the
>>reputation of these products speaks for itself, I am however advocating
>>PureBasic as a worthy alternative.
>
> Does the PureBsic inline ASM sup****t extended instructions such
> as SSE3 and AMD64 / EM64T? How about PoweBasic? FreeBasic?
AFAIK FreeBasic uses GAS as it's assembler. I could not find anything
concrete regarding actual x86 extensions I'd bet it'll sup****t pretty much
everything as well.
--
HK
|
