On Dec 19, 2:23=A0pm, "Auric__" <not.my.r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:57:31 GMT, edexter wrote:
> > On Dec 19, 9:13 am, "Auric__" <not.my.r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:14:21 GMT, edexter wrote:
> >> > I was not able to find a manual onbcxbasicso I put together this
> >> > unauthorised hack that may be helpfull to some people.
>
> >> >http://dexrow.blogspot.com/2007/12/unauthorised-bcx-basic-manual_19.
> >> > html
>
> >> I believe it's installed when you install the translator. CHM format,
> >> same directory asbcx.exe.
>
> > I believe you are right.. =A0There are some differences and you get to
> > know what all those numbered programs are... =A0It is truly a hack
> > though..
>
> How so? It's always answered every question I ever had.
>
> --
> Beware when God lets loose a thinker on this planet.
I had some trouble finding the manual and I wanted to use the program
bad enough to use what I could find in the examples... Now that I
have found the manual I will modify it to cover some holes I have
found and to be a usefull (hopefully) reference that shows what is in
the manual in a different way. One such hole is how to compile from
bcx basic to exe from the command line
http://dexrow.blogspot.com/2007/12/compiling-bcx-basic-file-to-exe.html
=2E. I started with what was the command line usage section in the
manual and then after that I tried to just load it into pelles c to
compile the exe... doesn't work and I only found out how to do that
by accident when I was looking through a bunch of do***entation off of
the internet (old yahoo postings). I am not saying anything bad about
the do***entation and I am thankfull to have it, I am just saying that
having one source isn't the way to go. Jesus had several
do***entators and books and bcx basic deserves more do***entation also
|
