Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic Misc > Re: The Onomast...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 12 Topic 1381 of 1492
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers

by Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 15, 2007 at 05:37 AM

On Nov 15, 3:27 pm, "n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Nov 15, 12:39 pm, Gary <LanceG...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > If you call your BASIC "BBC for windows" well clearly you are wanting
to
> > attract the older folk who learned BBC BASIC many years ago.
>
> Actually it's a terrible dilemma, because I'm trying to attract *both*
> those "older folk" and a whole new generation of BBC BASIC programmers
> who've never met it before.  I'm sure I discourage some of the latter
> by calling it 'BBC BASIC' rather than 'Whizzo BASIC' (TM) but on
> balance I feel the BBC's name still has some cachet (although probably
> not in the US).
>
> Short of marketing it under two completely different names (which
> would be a fascinating experiment) I don't know the answer to making
> its appeal broader than it is.
>
> Richard.http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
> To reply by email change 'news' to my forename.

In book selling it is common to sell the same product twice (e.g., the
hardback and the paperback editions). So perhaps two different names
would be no different than the common practice in bookselling. I think
'Whizzo' is probably a bit dated now, though. Do school kids still
call someone skilled at something a whizz? Best consult a marketing
group... :-)

Lance
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-11-14 14:48:32 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
"Auric__" <n  2007-11-14 14:53:55 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
"Ralph" <nt_  2007-11-14 10:52:00 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2007-11-14 11:41:52 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-11-15 04:39:40 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-11-15 04:40:46 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
"Ralph" <nt_  2007-11-15 10:19:17 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-11-15 04:41:03 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-11-15 05:27:33 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
"JJ" <stacko  2007-11-15 14:09:07 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-11-15 05:37:57 
Re: The Onomastics of BASIC compilers
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-11-15 13:59:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 20:25:55 CDT 2008.