Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation

On Wednesday 7 May 2008 20:16, schuler.steffen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> Why is LC_COLLATE instead of LC_ALL in the above case not enough?

This is another thing that confuses me. I tried that during my
experiments,
but didn't want to mention it to avoid putting too many irons in the fire.
Look:

$ cat file1
e
$ LC_COLLATE=C awk '/[A-Z]/' file1
e
$ LC_ALL=C awk '/[A-Z]/' file1
$

-- 
All the commands are tested with bash and GNU tools, so they may use
nonstandard features. I try to mention when something is nonstandard (if
I'm aware of that), but I may miss something. Corrections are welcome.