Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Awk > Re: Gawk match(...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 43 Topic 2231 of 2236
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation

by Ed Morton <morton@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 10:20 AM

On 5/7/2008 9:59 AM, Janis wrote:
> On 7 Mai, 16:18, Ed Morton <mor...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>On 5/6/2008 6:16 AM, Hermann Peifer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>
>>>I am somehwat puzzled with match() results for numbers in scientific
>>>notation. See below.
>>
>>>$ cat testdata
>>>100
>>>100e-3
>>>100E3
>>
>>>I am wondering what kind of uppercase character is matched in record
>>>2:
>>
>>>$ gawk '{print $1,match($1,/[A-Z]/)}' testdata
>>
>>There may not be an uppercase character matching. [A-Z] represents the
list of
>>characters in between the character A and the character Z in your locale
> 
> 
> Can you provide some reference for that definition?

From the GNU awk user guide
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/gawk.html#Character-Lists):

.... For example, in the default C locale, `[a-dx-z]' is equivalent to
`[abcdxyz]'. Many locales sort characters in dictionary order, and in
these
locales, `[a-dx-z]' is typically not equivalent to `[abcdxyz]'; instead it
might
be equivalent to `[aBbCcDdxXyYz]', for example.

> I thought that ranges like [A-Z] depend on the _coding_ of the
> character set (IOW, on the code values of the characters), and
> not depending on the locale.
> 
> So that in case you have a different code set than ISO Latin 1,
> ASCII, or similar, e.g. like EBCDIC (where there may be other
> characters spread in between the letter code positions) you'd
> get unexpected results.
> 
> So, because of that, your suggestion below is valid anyway, but
> I'd like to be sure about what you wrote if that is in fact true.

Sounds to me like it's dependent on locale but if what your describing
above is
something different from locale, then you may be right. Whatever the
"thingy" is
that causes the difference, using character classes is the right approach.

	Ed.

> Janis
> 
> 
>>- that
>>does NOT mean it has to be upper case characters. For example, your
locale might
>>consider characters ordered as:
>>
>>        aAbBcCdDeEfF....zZ
>>
>>so "e" would sit between "A" and "Z". That's why you should use
character
>>classes instead of specific ranges, e.g.:
>>
>>        gawk '{print $1,match($1,/[[:upper:]]/)}' testdata
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>        Ed.
> 
>




 43 Posts in Topic:
Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-06 04:16:01 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-06 13:28:06 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-07 07:11:38 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 09:18:57 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-07 19:50:11 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 13:03:32 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-07 20:39:44 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 21:48:37 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-08 19:21:58 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Janis <janis_papanagno  2008-05-07 07:59:10 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 10:20:16 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 17:25:24 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 10:37:01 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 18:04:24 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
schuler.steffen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 11:16:35 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-07 20:27:53 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Ed Morton <morton@[EMA  2008-05-07 21:49:51 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
schuler.steffen@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-07 13:16:24 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-08 11:25:06 
[OT] collating sequences: using glibc
Steffen Schuler <schul  2008-05-09 08:51:38 
Re: [OT] collating sequences: using glibc
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-09 10:32:37 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-08 06:58:39 
Re: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-08 16:22:59 
OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-08 08:46:54 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-08 18:11:28 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Janis Papanagnou <Jani  2008-05-08 22:29:32 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-08 22:49:38 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-09 09:44:54 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-09 10:24:00 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-08 09:45:28 
[OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Janis <janis_papanagno  2008-05-09 02:08:34 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-10 10:58:52 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-10 11:52:19 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-10 11:55:35 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-10 20:10:19 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-10 20:31:22 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Steffen Schuler <schul  2008-05-10 21:56:00 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-10 23:14:44 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Cesar Rabak <csrabak@[  2008-05-11 10:50:15 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-11 17:27:57 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
pk <pk@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-05-11 11:17:15 
Re: [OT] Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Janis Papanagnou <Jani  2008-05-10 15:07:10 
Re: OT: Gawk match() and numbers in scientific notation
Hermann Peifer <peifer  2008-05-13 03:41:09 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 8:39:11 CDT 2008.