Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: 64 gig memo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 188 of 189 Topic 308 of 328
Post > Topic >>

Re: 64 gig memory

by Mickey <mickeyb@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM

On Aug 29, 12:57 pm, hanco...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> I saw an ad for IBM's Z9 mainframe, saying it had 64 gigabytes of core
> (RAM) memory.  My first thought was "64, that's kind of low", and then
> I realized we were' talking gig, not meg, not K.
>
> When I started we had a machine with 192K sup****t an entire hospital.
> My next job was big time, 8 Meg, with maybe 1-2 gigabytes in disk
> memory (3330s with 200Meg packs).
>
> It blows my mind that everything we had on disk memory could now be
> left permanently in core memory since it's so cheap and we have so
> much of it.  Of course, disk memory is cheap too.

My son has a watch with EIGHTY times (640k) the ram of the first
mainframe I worked on. Yes, we have come quite a way these past 35+
years....

Mickey
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 09:57:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 18:16:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 15:28:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 23:39:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-30 11:31:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 13:28:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:34:21 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-31 00:03:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 07:45:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-31 13:12:57 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-08-31 16:36:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-13 17:28:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-13 20:48:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-14 00:55:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:47:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-01 12:28:52 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:41:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-02 12:10:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:34:51 
Re: 64 gig memory
Malcolm Beattie <mbeat  2007-08-29 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 11:54:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-29 23:07:41 
360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:46:02 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-01 09:36:07 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 09:36:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nn  2007-08-31 10:35:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Tim Shoppa <shoppa@[EM  2007-08-29 12:23:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 11:13:18 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyck  2007-08-29 17:23:34 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 19:52:56 
Re: 64 gig memory
Allodoxaphobia <bit-bu  2007-08-30 17:18:09 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:44:04 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 08:25:29 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 16:39:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 18:33:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 20:49:50 
Re: 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-08-30 07:09:31 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rene" <inva  2007-08-30 11:20:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 12:51:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-08-30 12:31:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-08-30 12:52:06 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:46:19 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 10:48:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:48:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 19:40:24 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 21:02:41 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:37:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-08-30 22:50:02 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-30 19:45:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-08-31 08:43:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-24 04:30:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-24 00:56:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-24 11:01:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:51:45 
VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:46 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 07:26:20 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:00:23 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-31 20:30:47 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 19:54:25 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-08-31 12:48:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-01 12:01:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:08:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 10:00:19 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-03 11:28:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:52:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:49:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:47 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:05:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-04 11:26:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:00:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-05 19:34:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:05:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:16:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 23:23:26 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:18:09 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:35:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:26:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-07 06:51:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:07:14 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:28:49 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:30:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:44:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 20:54:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-06 22:16:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 01:59:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-07 15:54:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-07 15:11:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Bernd Felsche <bernie@  2007-09-08 12:17:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 18:32:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:46:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-08 15:10:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-09 10:57:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-09 22:46:07 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:41:11 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-06 23:26:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-08-31 17:43:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-01 08:30:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:02:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-03 16:26:41 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-01 10:12:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-01 13:56:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 01:13:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:45:17 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-01 23:43:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:40:05 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:04:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:40:42 
360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-02 15:39:01 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 23:36:43 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-02 12:12:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
pechter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 17:33:24 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-21 10:35:46 
Re: 64 gig memory
rsteiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-02 17:21:37 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-03 06:50:40 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-03 11:19:08 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2007-09-03 15:54:56 
Re: 360/30 memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-03 13:10:01 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 09:57:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:54:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:07:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-03 16:53:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-03 16:12:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:47:52 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-04 14:17:50 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:46:45 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
John Varela <OLDlamps@  2007-09-06 21:42:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:14:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-08 10:31:26 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:31:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:43:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 10:39:02 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-04 12:25:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 13:30:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:50:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 11:49:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:42:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:01:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:48:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:17:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-09 21:36:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 12:47:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:29:34 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 22:48:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-08 10:29:59 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-03 14:51:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:08:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-05 18:26:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:48:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:28:31 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 11:58:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:36:57 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:34:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:37:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2007-09-03 08:19:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:30:35 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 15:17:37 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2007-09-04 22:12:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:38:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:52:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:55:21 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:56:39 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 06:43:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-06 09:30:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 13:21:43 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:49:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:23:32 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-14 06:15:33 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-18 02:07:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 08:54:36 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-18 11:17:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:39:26 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-19 06:37:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 20:15:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:37:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:32:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-22 10:12:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-22 13:27:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-22 13:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-23 10:39:59 
Re: 64 gig memory
Mickey <mickeyb@[EMAIL  2007-09-28 10:33:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-29 12:18:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 15:13:29 CDT 2008.