Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: Four York**...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 76 of 189 Topic 308 of 333
Post > Topic >>

Re: Four York****remen and 64 gig memory

by Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 4, 2007 at 10:16 PM

On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:17:50 -0500
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Stan Barr) wrote:

> On Tue, 04 Sep 07 09:47:52 GMT, jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 <jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:

> >They don't have a choice, do they?  Unix still requires a
> >systems programmer.
> 
> It seems to me Vista requires a competent Sysadmin, that's why home
users
> end up in such a mess.  The complexities of running a multi-tasking,
> multi-user system are not explained to them, presumably to avoid
> frightening them off.  The other day I spent half an hour explaining to
> my nephew just _why_ he shouldn't do his everyday computing while logged
> in with system admin privileges.  I don't think it quite sunk in...he
> still hasn't set up a login for himself as a *user*.

	If many games have the same problems running without admin
privileges under Vista that they do under XP then for many people running
there everyday computing under admin privileges is a *requirement* not a
choice (given that the games are part of the everyday computing). No home
user wants to faff around logging in and out they just want to switch the
box on and use it - IMHO this is reasonable.

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |   Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins.                | A better way to focus the
sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    licences available see
                                            |    http://www.sohara.org/
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 09:57:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 18:16:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 15:28:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 23:39:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-30 11:31:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 13:28:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:34:21 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-31 00:03:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 07:45:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-31 13:12:57 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-08-31 16:36:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-13 17:28:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-13 20:48:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-14 00:55:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:47:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-01 12:28:52 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:41:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-02 12:10:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:34:51 
Re: 64 gig memory
Malcolm Beattie <mbeat  2007-08-29 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 11:54:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-29 23:07:41 
360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:46:02 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-01 09:36:07 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 09:36:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nn  2007-08-31 10:35:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Tim Shoppa <shoppa@[EM  2007-08-29 12:23:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 11:13:18 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyck  2007-08-29 17:23:34 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 19:52:56 
Re: 64 gig memory
Allodoxaphobia <bit-bu  2007-08-30 17:18:09 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:44:04 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 08:25:29 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 16:39:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 18:33:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 20:49:50 
Re: 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-08-30 07:09:31 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rene" <inva  2007-08-30 11:20:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 12:51:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-08-30 12:31:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-08-30 12:52:06 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:46:19 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 10:48:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:48:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 19:40:24 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 21:02:41 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:37:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-08-30 22:50:02 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-30 19:45:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-08-31 08:43:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-24 04:30:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-24 00:56:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-24 11:01:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:51:45 
VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:46 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 07:26:20 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:00:23 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-31 20:30:47 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 19:54:25 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-08-31 12:48:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-01 12:01:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:08:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 10:00:19 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-03 11:28:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:52:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:49:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:47 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:05:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-04 11:26:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:00:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-05 19:34:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:05:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:16:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 23:23:26 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:18:09 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:35:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:26:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-07 06:51:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:07:14 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:28:49 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:30:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:44:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 20:54:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-06 22:16:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 01:59:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-07 15:54:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-07 15:11:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Bernd Felsche <bernie@  2007-09-08 12:17:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 18:32:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:46:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-08 15:10:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-09 10:57:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-09 22:46:07 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:41:11 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-06 23:26:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-08-31 17:43:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-01 08:30:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:02:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-03 16:26:41 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-01 10:12:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-01 13:56:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 01:13:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:45:17 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-01 23:43:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:40:05 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:04:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:40:42 
360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-02 15:39:01 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 23:36:43 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-02 12:12:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
pechter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 17:33:24 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-21 10:35:46 
Re: 64 gig memory
rsteiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-02 17:21:37 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-03 06:50:40 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-03 11:19:08 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2007-09-03 15:54:56 
Re: 360/30 memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-03 13:10:01 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 09:57:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:54:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:07:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-03 16:53:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-03 16:12:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:47:52 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-04 14:17:50 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:46:45 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
John Varela <OLDlamps@  2007-09-06 21:42:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:14:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-08 10:31:26 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:31:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:43:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 10:39:02 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-04 12:25:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 13:30:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:50:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 11:49:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:42:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:01:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:48:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:17:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-09 21:36:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 12:47:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:29:34 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 22:48:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-08 10:29:59 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-03 14:51:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:08:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-05 18:26:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:48:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:28:31 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 11:58:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:36:57 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:34:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:37:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2007-09-03 08:19:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:30:35 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 15:17:37 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2007-09-04 22:12:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:38:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:52:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:55:21 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:56:39 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 06:43:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-06 09:30:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 13:21:43 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:49:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:23:32 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-14 06:15:33 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-18 02:07:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 08:54:36 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-18 11:17:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:39:26 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-19 06:37:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 20:15:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:37:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:32:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-22 10:12:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-22 13:27:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-22 13:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-23 10:39:59 
Re: 64 gig memory
Mickey <mickeyb@[EMAIL  2007-09-28 10:33:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-29 12:18:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 8:05:14 CDT 2008.