Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: Four York**...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 65 of 189 Topic 308 of 333
Post > Topic >>

Re: Four York****remen and 64 gig memory

by jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sep 3, 2007 at 10:00 AM

In article <mddps102mu1.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
   Rich Alderson <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:
>
>> In article <5jqv2qFtp72U1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>    Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> J de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>
>>>> You do realize, don't you, that this is one of those threads that can
>>>> only possibly end with "And you try and tell the young people of
today
>>>> that ..... they won't believe you."?
>
>>> We were expected to believe without being told.
>
>> The kids can be pointed at an emulator and told to boot up an
>> -11, -8 or -10 OS.
>
>> Is there a IBM 1620 emulator?
>
>Yup.  Same family of emulator programs, SimH, which does all of
>
>    Data General Nova, Eclipse
>    Digital Equipment Cor****ation PDP-1, PDP-4, PDP-7, PDP-8, PDP-9,
PDP-10,
>                                  PDP-11, PDP-15, VAX
>    GRI Cor****ation GRI-909
>    IBM 1401, 1620, 1130,  7090/7094, System 3
>              ^^^^
>    Interdata (Perkin-Elmer) 16b and 32b systems
>    Hewlett-Packard 2114, 2115, 2116, 2100, 21MX
>    Honeywell H316/H516
>    MITS Altair 8800, with both 8080 and Z80
>    Royal-Mcbee LGP-30, LGP-21
>    Scientific Data Systems SDS 940
>
The only problem with software emulator is the kids don't get
the "feel" of the machine.  I have yet to figure out how to
explain this phrase but it includes sound, smell, touch, 
typing cadence, and the activities of keeping the gear clean.

/BAH
 




 189 Posts in Topic:
64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 09:57:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 18:16:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 15:28:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 23:39:40 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-30 11:31:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 13:28:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:34:21 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-31 00:03:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 07:45:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-08-31 13:12:57 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-08-31 16:36:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-13 17:28:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-13 20:48:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-14 00:55:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:47:11 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-01 12:28:52 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:41:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
SkippyPB <swiegand@[EM  2007-09-02 12:10:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:34:51 
Re: 64 gig memory
Malcolm Beattie <mbeat  2007-08-29 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-08-29 11:54:27 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-08-29 23:07:41 
360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Eric Smith <eric@[EMAI  2007-08-31 22:46:02 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-01 09:36:07 
Re: 360/30 memory expansion (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 09:36:08 
Re: 64 gig memory
Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nn  2007-08-31 10:35:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Tim Shoppa <shoppa@[EM  2007-08-29 12:23:43 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 11:13:18 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rostyslaw J. Lewyck  2007-08-29 17:23:34 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-29 19:52:56 
Re: 64 gig memory
Allodoxaphobia <bit-bu  2007-08-30 17:18:09 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:44:04 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-08-31 08:25:29 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 16:39:45 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 18:33:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 20:49:50 
Re: 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-08-30 07:09:31 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 18:25:10 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Rene" <inva  2007-08-30 11:20:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-30 12:51:05 
Re: 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-08-30 12:31:20 
Re: 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-08-30 12:52:06 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:46:19 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-30 10:48:32 
Re: 64 gig memory
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-30 16:48:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-08-30 19:40:24 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-08-30 21:02:41 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:37:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-08-30 22:50:02 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-08-30 19:45:16 
Re: 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-08-31 08:43:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-24 04:30:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-24 00:56:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-24 11:01:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-09-04 13:51:45 
VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:46 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 07:26:20 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:00:23 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-08-31 20:30:47 
Re: VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places.
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-31 19:54:25 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-08-31 04:09:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-08-31 12:48:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-01 12:01:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:08:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 10:00:19 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-03 11:28:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:52:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:49:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:47 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:05:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-04 11:26:25 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:00:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-05 19:34:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-08-31 13:05:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 22:16:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 23:23:26 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:18:09 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:35:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:26:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-07 06:51:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:07:14 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:28:49 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:30:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:44:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 20:54:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-06 22:16:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 01:59:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-07 15:54:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-07 15:11:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Bernd Felsche <bernie@  2007-09-08 12:17:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 18:32:46 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:46:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-08 15:10:04 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-09 10:57:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Roland Hutchinson <my.  2007-09-09 22:46:07 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:41:11 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-06 23:26:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-08-31 17:43:15 
Re: 64 gig memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-01 08:30:22 
Re: 64 gig memory
Rich Alderson <news@[E  2007-09-03 04:02:12 
Re: 64 gig memory
Paul Hinman <paul.hinm  2007-09-03 16:26:41 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-01 10:12:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-01 13:56:56 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 01:13:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-01 21:45:17 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-01 23:43:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-09-02 23:40:05 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:04:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:40:42 
360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-02 15:39:01 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-02 23:36:43 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-02 12:12:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
pechter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 17:33:24 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-21 10:35:46 
Re: 64 gig memory
rsteiner@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-02 17:21:37 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-03 06:50:40 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
"Sven Pran" <  2007-09-03 11:19:08 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
John Byrns <byrnsj@[EM  2007-09-03 15:54:56 
Re: 360/30 memory
Anne & Lynn Wheeler &  2007-09-03 13:10:01 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-03 09:57:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 12:54:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-03 14:19:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-03 15:07:18 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-03 16:53:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
ArarghMail709NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-09-03 16:12:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:47:52 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
stanb45@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-04 14:17:50 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:46:45 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
John Varela <OLDlamps@  2007-09-06 21:42:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:14:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-08 10:31:26 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-04 17:31:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:29:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:43:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 10:39:02 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-04 12:25:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-04 13:30:51 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:50:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 11:49:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:42:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:01:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:48:08 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-07 10:17:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-09 21:36:13 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 12:47:44 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:29:34 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-07 22:48:29 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-08 10:29:59 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-03 14:51:10 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-05 17:08:15 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-05 18:26:23 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-06 09:48:12 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosm  2007-09-07 11:28:31 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-07 11:58:42 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-08 09:36:57 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:34:33 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-03 07:37:55 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
bbreynolds <bbreynolds  2007-09-03 08:19:53 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-04 09:30:35 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Steve O'Hara-Smith <st  2007-09-04 15:17:37 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Clark F Morris <cfmpub  2007-09-04 22:12:27 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 11:38:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-05 10:46:16 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:52:06 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-05 18:55:21 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-05 21:56:39 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 06:43:09 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-06 09:30:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-06 13:21:43 
Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-06 07:49:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Quadibloc <jsavard@[EM  2007-09-06 18:23:32 
Re: 360/30 memory (was Re: 64 gig memory)
Lawrence Wilkinson <la  2007-09-14 06:15:33 
Re: 64 gig memory
Brian Inglis <Brian.In  2007-09-18 02:07:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
kkt <kkt@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 08:54:36 
Re: 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-18 11:17:17 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:39:26 
Re: 64 gig memory
Peter Flass <Peter_Fla  2007-09-19 06:37:53 
Re: 64 gig memory
krw <krw@[EMAIL PROTEC  2007-09-18 20:15:03 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-18 21:37:36 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
J de Boyne Pollard <j.  2007-09-21 04:32:32 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
"Charlie Gibbs"  2007-09-22 10:12:03 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-22 13:27:58 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
Frank McCoy <mccoyf@[E  2007-09-22 13:36:20 
Re: Four Yorkshiremen and 64 gig memory
jmfbahciv@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2007-09-23 10:39:59 
Re: 64 gig memory
Mickey <mickeyb@[EMAIL  2007-09-28 10:33:48 
Re: 64 gig memory
Walter Bushell <proto@  2007-09-29 12:18:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 18:28:21 CDT 2008.