Re: Cycles per ASM instruction

Arthur T. wrote:
> In
> Message-ID:<1172092795.418010.174730@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 
> 
>>>      I remember seeing them for the 370/115.  It's hard to forget
>>> that moving from a 360/22 to a 370/115 gave us a CVD timing worse
>>> by one to two orders of magnitude.  IIRC, the number of cycles for
>>> that instruction was approx 250.
>>
>> Are you saying the 370-115 was slower than the 360-22?  (I didn't even
>> know there was a model 22).
> 
>      The 22 was effectively a 30, but it had a max of 16KB,

The mod 30's maxed out at 64KB (and, yes, for you young folks the "K" is 
correct). By modern standards, these were itty bitty machines.