Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: OFF TOPIC: ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 6 Topic 291 of 328
Post > Topic >>

Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question

by ArarghMail701NOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 19, 2007 at 06:12 PM

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:58:24 -0500, "John W. Kennedy"
<jwkenne@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>> OFF TOPIC:
>> 
>> On the IBM 1401, I heard that one has to issue two "clear storage"
>> instructions to totally clear out storage.  The first execution clears
>> out a ****tion, the second clears out the rest.  Something to do with
>> the print area, which is a reserved section of storage?
>> 
>> Any explanation would be appreciated.
>
>Monstrously twisted, though one can just barely make out the original 
>truth through the fog. The CS instruction cleared downward from the 
>given address through (inclusively) the next lower xxx00 address. So it 
>would take as many as 160 CS instructions to clear all of storage, 
>starting at 15999 (or whatever the high address was) and going down by 
>100s to 99.
All the way to 0.  :-)  A "/099" would clear from 99 to 0.
>
>The read, punch, and print areas were all reserved, in 1-80, 101-180, 
>and 201-332. In addition, 0 and 100 were volatile (they were used by the 
>card reader and card punch), and 87-89, 92-94, and 97-99 were the 
>(optional) index registers.

The CS command would still clear the reserved areas.

I knew that location 0 was used by the reader, but hadn't known about
100.
-- 
ArarghMail701 at [drop the 'http://www.'
from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the garbage from the reply address.
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-01-19 11:13:11 
Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2007-01-19 14:58:24 
Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
ArarghMail701NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-01-19 18:12:24 
Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
Sparky Spartacus <Spar  2007-02-26 05:09:10 
Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
ArarghMail701NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-01-19 18:23:11 
Re: OFF TOPIC: IBM 1401 question
ArarghMail701NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-01-19 22:42:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 0:53:59 CDT 2008.