Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: S/360
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 67 of 79 Topic 266 of 328
Post > Topic >>

Re: S/360

by "robin" <robin_v@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 30, 2006 at 12:03 AM

"glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:qdadnW50orKK3ufZRVn-sQ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> robin wrote:
>
> > The precision of S/390 is 21 bits or 53 bits.
> > You don't lose this precision on division by 4.
>
> The precision is between 21 and 24 for short,

I'm referring to the guaranteed precision.

> and between
> 56 and 53 for long.  The algorithms for the most libraries
> were designed not to lose precision unnecessarily.
>
> 0.9 has 24 bits of precision in short float.

Well, only 21 bits.  You can't count on more.

>  Divide it by
> four and it loses two bits.  Multiply or divide the result by four
> and you don't gain them back again, though the bits are again
> available.  That is precision loss.

It isn't, because only 21 bits a guaranteed, and that's what you get.

BTW, if you divide an integer by 4, you lose two bits, and
you don't get them back when you multiply the result by 4.

And if you multiply .9 by 10 you don't get 9.
 




 79 Posts in Topic:
Re: S/360
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-01-13 09:25:48 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 15:26:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-13 23:28:44 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:30:47 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-14 02:00:48 
Re: S/360
"Donald L. Dobbs&quo  2006-01-14 11:53:14 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-15 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-15 11:46:34 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 00:26:15 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:40 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:41 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-16 20:11:37 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 19:28:21 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-16 20:19:01 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 21:59:58 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 13:01:21 
Re: S/360
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 13:35:59 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 21:09:17 
Re: S/360
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 22:00:29 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 22:11:17 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 19:11:38 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-18 04:18:15 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 21:00:10 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-18 13:27:46 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-17 21:18:17 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-17 22:16:30 
Re: S/360
ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-01-19 06:31:58 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-19 11:31:46 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-19 14:25:29 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:11:31 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:29 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:53:43 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-21 23:45:18 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 07:27:13 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 02:45:39 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 10:26:38 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 05:33:34 
Re: S/360
Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-22 09:05:28 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:39:26 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 18:07:39 
Re: S/360
Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-23 01:47:44 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:37:49 
Re: S/360
"R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:07 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-02-02 23:36:41 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-19 20:14:04 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:17 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:16 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:22:49 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:31 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:59:22 
Re: S/360
"R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-04-08 03:34:11 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-07 22:16:04 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-04-10 01:05:09 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-04-10 06:34:38 
Re: S/360
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2006-04-10 19:51:31 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-10 17:48:54 
Re: S/360
"James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-04-10 23:15:40 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-26 17:41:26 
Re: S/360
"James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-05-27 05:12:32 
Re: S/360
ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-05-27 08:45:31 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-25 13:49:57 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-29 00:37:01 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-28 17:41:27 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-30 00:03:10 
Re: S/360
Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-05-31 21:16:13 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-02 23:27:59 
Re: S/360
Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-06-03 12:19:30 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-07 10:58:32 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-06-07 13:59:32 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-10 22:47:44 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-02-03 15:05:02 
Re: S/360
"Sven Pran" <  2006-01-14 01:32:19 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:49:54 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-14 00:22:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 15:19:54 CDT 2008.