Re: question about dynalloc

On 19 May 2006 11:23:04 -0700, "jim" <jwalker216@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>I have done a dynalloc of a SHR dsn.  I have verified that the dsn was
>allocated to my TSO session.  I did the same thing with the same dsn
>via use of a DD in the batch jcl I was running.  In both cases, I
>looked at the JFCB.  They are different.  Why?

How did you verify the dsn was allocated?  How did you look at the
JFCB in each case?  Which JFCB fields were different?  At what point
in the two cases did you look at the JFCB?


Remove del for email