Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: S/360
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 79 Topic 266 of 328
Post > Topic >>

Re: S/360

by glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 17, 2006 at 07:11 PM

Dan Nagle wrote:

(snip)

> No Cray-1 ever had hardware divide.
> Floating point divide was always a reciprocal approximation,
> followed by correcting multiplications.  A special 2-a.b instruction
> applied part of the correction.

Well, it was used to implement divide in high-level languages.

I thought I remembered that multiply was not accurate out to the
last bit, the reciprocal approximation obviously isn't.  Maybe the
corrected reciprocal is pretty close.

Back to the 360, the 360/91 uses a divide algorithm similar to Cray,
except that it does the multiply at the same time.  It generates a
rounded quotient, unlike the truncated quotient that S/360 specifies.
As a result, it violates the Principles of Operation by being closer to 
the right answer.

-- glen
 




 79 Posts in Topic:
Re: S/360
hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-01-13 09:25:48 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 15:26:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-13 23:28:44 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:30:47 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-14 02:00:48 
Re: S/360
"Donald L. Dobbs&quo  2006-01-14 11:53:14 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-15 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-15 11:46:34 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 00:26:15 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:40 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:41 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-16 20:11:37 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 19:28:21 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-16 20:19:01 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 21:59:58 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 13:01:21 
Re: S/360
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 13:35:59 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 21:09:17 
Re: S/360
Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 22:00:29 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 22:11:17 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 19:11:38 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-18 04:18:15 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 21:00:10 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-18 13:27:46 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-17 21:18:17 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-17 22:16:30 
Re: S/360
ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-01-19 06:31:58 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-19 11:31:46 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-19 14:25:29 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:11:31 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:29 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:53:43 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-21 23:45:18 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 07:27:13 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 02:45:39 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 10:26:38 
Re: S/360
ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 05:33:34 
Re: S/360
Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-22 09:05:28 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:39:26 
Re: S/360
"Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 18:07:39 
Re: S/360
Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-23 01:47:44 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:37:49 
Re: S/360
"R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:07 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-02-02 23:36:41 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-19 20:14:04 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:17 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:16 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:22:49 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:31 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:59:22 
Re: S/360
"R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-04-08 03:34:11 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-07 22:16:04 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-04-10 01:05:09 
Re: S/360
"Tom Linden" &l  2006-04-10 06:34:38 
Re: S/360
Binyamin Dissen <posti  2006-04-10 19:51:31 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-10 17:48:54 
Re: S/360
"James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-04-10 23:15:40 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-26 17:41:26 
Re: S/360
"James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-05-27 05:12:32 
Re: S/360
ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-05-27 08:45:31 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-25 13:49:57 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-29 00:37:01 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-28 17:41:27 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-05-30 00:03:10 
Re: S/360
Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-05-31 21:16:13 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-02 23:27:59 
Re: S/360
Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-06-03 12:19:30 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-07 10:58:32 
Re: S/360
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-06-07 13:59:32 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-10 22:47:44 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
"robin" <rob  2006-02-03 15:05:02 
Re: S/360
"Sven Pran" <  2006-01-14 01:32:19 
Re: S/360
"John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:49:54 
Re: S/360
multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-14 00:22:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 20:04:32 CDT 2008.