Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly 370 > Re: S/360
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 79 Topic 266 of 328
 Post > Topic >>

Re: S/360

by hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 13, 2006 at 09:25 AM

John W. Kennedy wrote:
> It is very well known that the entire 360 FP feature could have used
> some input from numerical analysts; it's shot full of design defects.

Could you elaborate on those design defects?

How did S/360 compare with its predecessor machines (ie 709x) regarding
those defects?  What differences did competitors machines--those
available in 1965--have compared to S/360 regarding these defects?




 79 Posts in Topic:
Re: S/360
 hancock4@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2006-01-13 09:25:48 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 15:26:11 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-13 23:28:44 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:30:47 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-14 02:00:48 
Re: S/360
 "Donald L. Dobbs&quo  2006-01-14 11:53:14 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-15 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-15 11:46:34 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 00:26:15 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:40 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-16 23:28:41 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-16 20:11:37 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 19:28:21 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-16 20:19:01 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-16 21:59:58 
Re: S/360
 multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 13:01:21 
Re: S/360
 Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 13:35:59 
Re: S/360
 multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 21:09:17 
Re: S/360
 Dan Nagle <dannagle@[E  2006-01-17 22:00:29 
Re: S/360
 multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-17 22:11:17 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 19:11:38 
Re: S/360
 multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-18 04:18:15 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-17 21:00:10 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-18 13:27:46 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-17 21:18:17 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-17 22:16:30 
Re: S/360
 ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-01-19 06:31:58 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-19 11:31:46 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Linden" &l  2006-01-19 14:25:29 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:11:31 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:29 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:53:43 
Re: S/360
 ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-21 23:45:18 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 07:27:13 
Re: S/360
 ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 02:45:39 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 10:26:38 
Re: S/360
 ararghmail601NOSPAM@[EMAI  2006-01-22 05:33:34 
Re: S/360
 Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-22 09:05:28 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:39:26 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Lake" <  2006-01-22 18:07:39 
Re: S/360
 Bob Lidral <l1dralspam  2006-01-23 01:47:44 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-22 12:37:49 
Re: S/360
 "R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:07 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-02-02 23:36:41 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-01-19 20:14:04 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:17 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-20 00:14:16 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 00:22:49 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-01-22 02:11:31 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-21 23:59:22 
Re: S/360
 "R. Vowels" <  2006-01-24 14:25:08 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-04-08 03:34:11 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-07 22:16:04 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-04-10 01:05:09 
Re: S/360
 "Tom Linden" &l  2006-04-10 06:34:38 
Re: S/360
 Binyamin Dissen <posti  2006-04-10 19:51:31 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-04-10 17:48:54 
Re: S/360
 "James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-04-10 23:15:40 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-26 17:41:26 
Re: S/360
 "James J. Weinkam&qu  2006-05-27 05:12:32 
Re: S/360
 ime@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (R  2006-05-27 08:45:31 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-05-25 12:58:54 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-25 13:49:57 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-05-29 00:37:01 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-05-28 17:41:27 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-05-30 00:03:10 
Re: S/360
 Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-05-31 21:16:13 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-06-02 23:27:59 
Re: S/360
 Steve Myers <noone@[EM  2006-06-03 12:19:30 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-06-07 10:58:32 
Re: S/360
 glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2006-06-07 13:59:32 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-06-10 22:47:44 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-06-01 22:06:11 
Re: S/360
 "robin" <rob  2006-02-03 15:05:02 
Re: S/360
 "Sven Pran" <  2006-01-14 01:32:19 
Re: S/360
 "John W. Kennedy&quo  2006-01-13 19:49:54 
Re: S/360
 multicsfan <multicsfan  2006-01-14 00:22:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Wed May 14 3:32:34 CDT 2008.