On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:37:48 +0000 (UTC) richgr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Rich Greenberg)
wrote:
:>In article <42d5840c$0$21446$ba620e4c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
:>Michel Castelein <arcis@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
:>>A DC or DS instruction with a zero duplication factor forces boundary
:>>alignment, even when the NOALIGN assembler option is in effect.
:>>At the other hand, IMHO, the assembler always aligns machine
instructions on
:>>a halfword boundary.
:>>So, I'm wondering why the expansion of the SAVE macro begins with a DS
0H.
:>>That's redundant, isn't it?
:>>Or are there some historical reasons? If yes, which ones?
:>I think that SAVE has both list and execute forms as well as normal, and
:>the DS 0H is probably in common code before the forms diverge.
It does not.
--
Binyamin Dissen <bdissen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
|
