Re: NDISASM: doesn't recognize all Mod/RM extension opcodes?

Robert Redelmeier wrote:
> Frank Kotler <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in part:
>> Still... if you've got a choice between a tool with a potentially 
>> exploitable buffer overflow, and an otherwise all-around improved 
>> version of the same tool without it, which would you choose?
> 
> Well, I guess the one without the overflow.  Forgive me for I have
> sinned:  I have been known to compile code without reading it.
> The overflow might increase my vulnerability slightly.

Yeah... the operative word is "slightly". I have a hard time imagining 
anyone writing exploits into assembly language code. But still...

Best,
Frank