Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly x86 > Re: Alternative...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 9 Topic 4623 of 4729
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Alternative PE linkers?

by "robertwessel2@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 02:46 PM

On Apr 22, 3:56 am, Richard Russell  <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mainly it's just a hatred of waste.  The application is a run-time
> engine for a programming language; a copy is embedded in *every*
> 'compiled' program.  If I can reduce the size of the executable, every
> one of those programs will get smaller (when recompiled).  Although
> individually the saving may be small, taken together it could be
> worthwhile.


Why not make it a shared library (a DLL, if this is Windows).  That
way it takes (almost) *no* space in each executable.




 9 Posts in Topic:
Alternative PE linkers?
 Richard Russell <spam  2008-04-20 02:31:32 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 Tim Roberts <spamtrap  2008-04-22 03:00:42 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 DJ Delorie <dj@[EMAIL   2008-04-21 23:55:05 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 Richard Russell <spam  2008-04-22 01:56:44 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 "robertwessel2@[EMAI  2008-04-22 14:46:10 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 Richard Russell <spam  2008-04-23 01:14:34 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 "Jim Carlock"   2008-04-27 18:45:15 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 dila <spamtrap@[EMAIL  2008-04-25 10:12:34 
Re: Alternative PE linkers?
 Richard Russell <spam  2008-04-28 02:18:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 15:00:41 CDT 2008.