Re: Any more graceful way to saturate adds?

On Apr 13, 11:41 pm, "Rod Pemberton"  <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Alexei A. Frounze" <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:58afc87d-dcb4-4688-97d6-be2c044c8828@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Apr 13, 8:27 am, "Rod Pemberton"  <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > "Terje Mathisen" <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > ...
>
> > While we're at it, how about complementing this with a similar
> > solution for signed saturation (-128 to +127) of signed bytes for the
> > fun of it? :)
>
> ???  How's your server?
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.asm.x86/msg/36af00ed6b8201aehttp://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.asm.x86/msg/b994b1ae492f9833
>
> RP

Missed the posts. Still I was wondering if someone came up with a
compact method not involving jumps and LUTs.

Alex