Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly x86 > Re: int 0x13 ut...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 57 Topic 4584 of 4710
Post > Topic >>

Re: int 0x13 utility

by ArarghMail803NOSPAM <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 31, 2008 at 07:18 PM

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:17:38 -0400, "Rod Pemberton"
<spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:hn40v396a9ar7ds6cgr5n2d2pvspetlt0h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:45:39 -0400, "Rod Pemberton"
>> <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> >"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >news:04auu3t4tqpd76bk9bh5807j1lvt4ssddj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> when I said "Correct", not about which kind of LBA sup****t was in
what
>> >> version.  :-)
>> >>
>> >
>> >I didn't use Win95 much either.  I'm still having a problem
determining
>> >specifically which Win95 version added LBA for FAT32.  Most sources
say
>> >Win95b (since FDISK added sup****t for partition type 0x0C), but some
say
>> >Win95c...  I haven't been able to find a (reputable) source with
version
>> >numbers (e.g., 4.00.1111 or 4.03.1214, etc) that indicates which was
the
>> >first with LBA sup****t for FAT32.  Still working on tracking it
down...
>> >
>> Well, based on this table that I found somewhere, (long line wrapping
>> from Agent), I would guess ---

<snip>

>>  --- THIS one:
>> Win 95B OSR 2.0 fnl OEM 4.00.0950 B 7.10 [4.00.1111] 08-24-96 +
>> 11:11:11 4.00.1111
>
>I give.  What made you guess (correctly, from Alex Buell's post) that
one?
OSR 2 has MSDOS 7.10, which is when FAT32 became available, AFAIK.

<snip>
>I'm interested.  I see one number I don't recognize: 4.01.0971.
>
>Okay, Google search for:
>OEM 4.00.0950 4.00.1111 11-26-97 4.01.0971
>has four links to large lists with that version and Google Groups had
>another.

My list probably came from mdgx.com.

>Thanks, I think those links will do.  Although, they don't seem list
>capability info...

Remember, most versions of fdisk have a bug that limits them to a
64gig FAT32 partition.  I think it got fixed in ME.  In any case,
there is/was an update for that problem from MS.
-- 
ArarghMail803 at [drop the 'http://www.'
from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.
 




 57 Posts in Topic:
int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-22 15:30:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
dave <spamtrap@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 16:27:30 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-23 08:45:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-23 08:37:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Hendrik van der Heijden   2008-03-24 14:50:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-24 21:15:00 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-25 01:11:15 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-25 13:57:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"H. Peter Anvin"  2008-03-28 15:59:06 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-28 20:07:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-29 23:04:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 00:47:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-30 15:45:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 17:31:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:38 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-31 19:18:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:13:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-31 03:32:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Red Rooster <spamtrap  2008-04-01 17:03:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-05 08:02:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-05 18:52:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-04-05 20:13:01 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-06 10:19:57 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:11:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:15:08 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 02:38:35 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-26 13:53:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:39:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-27 07:41:53 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 14:36:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-29 21:05:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 13:25:19 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-27 09:00:59 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:07:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-30 13:53:33 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 13:06:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Tim Roberts <spamtrap  2008-04-01 03:21:14 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:22:43 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-26 07:57:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:36:04 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-27 10:15:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 00:23:24 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 09:22:44 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:48 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-01 08:31:58 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:00:41 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:07:45 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-02 08:57:03 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-02 20:03:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-03 22:11:23 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-03 23:11:29 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 08:33:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 12:58:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Spiro Trikaliotis <sp  2008-04-06 11:34:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-06 18:02:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 21:04:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 21:31:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 20:10:27 CDT 2008.