"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:hn40v396a9ar7ds6cgr5n2d2pvspetlt0h@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:45:39 -0400, "Rod Pemberton"
> <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:04auu3t4tqpd76bk9bh5807j1lvt4ssddj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> when I said "Correct", not about which kind of LBA sup****t was in
what
> >> version. :-)
> >>
> >
> >I didn't use Win95 much either. I'm still having a problem determining
> >specifically which Win95 version added LBA for FAT32. Most sources say
> >Win95b (since FDISK added sup****t for partition type 0x0C), but some
say
> >Win95c... I haven't been able to find a (reputable) source with
version
> >numbers (e.g., 4.00.1111 or 4.03.1214, etc) that indicates which was
the
> >first with LBA sup****t for FAT32. Still working on tracking it down...
> >
> Well, based on this table that I found somewhere, (long line wrapping
> from Agent), I would guess ---
>
> OS RELEASE VERSION MS-DOS REVISION TIME +
> DATE BUILD
> Win 95 final retail 4.00.0950 7.00 [4.00.0950] 07-11-95 +
> 09:50:00 4.00.0950
> Win 95 final OEM 4.00.0950 7.00 [4.00.0950] 07-11-95 +
> 09:50:00 4.00.0950
> Win 95a OSR1 final Updt 4.00.0950 a 7.00 [4.00.0950] 02-02-96 +
> 09:51:00 4.00.0951
>
> --- THIS one:
> Win 95B OSR 2.0 fnl OEM 4.00.0950 B 7.10 [4.00.1111] 08-24-96 +
> 11:11:11 4.00.1111
I give. What made you guess (correctly, from Alex Buell's post) that one?
> Win 95B OSR 2.1 fnlUpdt 4.00.0950 B 7.10 [4.00.1111] 04-10-97 +
> 12:14:00 4.03.1212
> Win 95B OSR 2.1 fnl OEM 4.01.0971 B 7.10 [4.00.1111] 06-25-97 +
> 09:07:10 4.01.0971
> Win 95C OSR 2.5 fnl OEM 4.00.0950 C 7.10 [4.00.1111] 11-26-97 +
> 12:16:00 4.03.1214
>
> but it is only a guess. :-)
>
> Also, if you want the full list, email me, and I will send it. It
> goes up thru ME.
>
I'm interested. I see one number I don't recognize: 4.01.0971.
Okay, Google search for:
OEM 4.00.0950 4.00.1111 11-26-97 4.01.0971
has four links to large lists with that version and Google Groups had
another.
Thanks, I think those links will do. Although, they don't seem list
capability info...
Rod Pemberton
|
