Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly x86 > Re: int 0x13 ut...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 57 Topic 4584 of 4774
Post > Topic >>

Re: int 0x13 utility

by "Wolfgang Kern" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 31, 2008 at 03:32 AM

H. Peter Anvin in discussion with JJ and Alex Buell:

....
I cannot follow all the arguments quoted in here.

LBA28 sup****t never depend on an OS, only the BIOS know if
the HW can handle LBA28/48 or just CHS.

The BIOS itself may converted CHS to LBA (if the drive allow it).

This wierd DOS-re****ted disk-geometry never reflected the physical
layout of a disk, INT13 parameters must be recalculated to the actual
(even faked) geometry before loading HDC-registers.

So even a DOS5.00 were able to RD/WR the first 512 MB on every
re****ted partition.
Dos 6.00 can RD/WR 2GB ...
any later MS-DOS may be able to access up to 8GB
but as I said already in this thread:

If the HW is able to sup****t, it can access up to: "CHS-limit = 127.5 GB"
not too much difference to LBA28 ...

Neither My win98se nor my WinXphome will even recognise that
some of my HDs are larger than 128 GB.
Shall I laugh or cry on this yet ?
__
wolfgang
 




 57 Posts in Topic:
int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-22 15:30:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
dave <spamtrap@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 16:27:30 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-23 08:45:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-23 08:37:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Hendrik van der Heijden   2008-03-24 14:50:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-24 21:15:00 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-25 01:11:15 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-25 13:57:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"H. Peter Anvin"  2008-03-28 15:59:06 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-28 20:07:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-29 23:04:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 00:47:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-30 15:45:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 17:31:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:38 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-31 19:18:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:13:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-31 03:32:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Red Rooster <spamtrap  2008-04-01 17:03:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-05 08:02:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-05 18:52:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-04-05 20:13:01 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-06 10:19:57 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:11:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:15:08 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 02:38:35 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-26 13:53:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:39:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-27 07:41:53 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 14:36:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-29 21:05:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 13:25:19 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-27 09:00:59 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:07:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-30 13:53:33 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 13:06:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Tim Roberts <spamtrap  2008-04-01 03:21:14 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:22:43 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-26 07:57:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:36:04 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-27 10:15:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 00:23:24 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 09:22:44 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:48 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-01 08:31:58 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:00:41 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:07:45 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-02 08:57:03 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-02 20:03:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-03 22:11:23 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-03 23:11:29 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 08:33:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 12:58:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Spiro Trikaliotis <sp  2008-04-06 11:34:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-06 18:02:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 21:04:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 21:31:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Sep 7 6:58:21 CDT 2008.