Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly x86 > Re: int 0x13 ut...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 57 Topic 4584 of 4729
Post > Topic >>

Re: int 0x13 utility

by ArarghMail803NOSPAM <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 30, 2008 at 12:47 AM

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:04:27 -0400, "Rod Pemberton"
<spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:9h5ru3tdlgtbepj0kkjg8glf0oej9mf3rl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:59:06 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin"
>> <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>> >
>> >Not just "pretty likely".
>
>True, MS-DOS 6.22 doesn't have LBA...
>
>> > LBA sup****t was added in Windows 95 OSR2,
>> >which I believe is MS-DOS 7.10.
>> >
>> Correct.
>
>Wrong.  You meant to say: LBA sup****t *for FAT32* was...   LBA sup****t
was
>first added to Windows 95 for FAT16 partition types 0x0E ("FAT16X") and
0x0F
>(extended "FAT16X").  Windows 95 uses MS-DOS 7.00.
Ok.  I never got that far into Win95.

I was mostly thinking about:

"Windows 95 OSR2, which I believe is MS-DOS 7.10."

when I said "Correct", not about which kind of LBA sup****t was in what
version.  :-)

-- 
ArarghMail803 at [drop the 'http://www.'
from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.
 




 57 Posts in Topic:
int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-22 15:30:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
dave <spamtrap@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 16:27:30 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-23 08:45:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-23 08:37:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Hendrik van der Heijden   2008-03-24 14:50:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-24 21:15:00 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-25 01:11:15 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-25 13:57:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"H. Peter Anvin"  2008-03-28 15:59:06 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-28 20:07:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-29 23:04:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 00:47:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-30 15:45:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 17:31:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:38 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-31 19:18:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:13:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-31 03:32:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Red Rooster <spamtrap  2008-04-01 17:03:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-05 08:02:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-05 18:52:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-04-05 20:13:01 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-06 10:19:57 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:11:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:15:08 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 02:38:35 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-26 13:53:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:39:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-27 07:41:53 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 14:36:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-29 21:05:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 13:25:19 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-27 09:00:59 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:07:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-30 13:53:33 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 13:06:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Tim Roberts <spamtrap  2008-04-01 03:21:14 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:22:43 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-26 07:57:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:36:04 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-27 10:15:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 00:23:24 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 09:22:44 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:48 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-01 08:31:58 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:00:41 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:07:45 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-02 08:57:03 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-02 20:03:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-03 22:11:23 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-03 23:11:29 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 08:33:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 12:58:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Spiro Trikaliotis <sp  2008-04-06 11:34:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-06 18:02:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 21:04:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 21:31:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 15:00:15 CDT 2008.