Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly x86 > Re: int 0x13 ut...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 30 of 57 Topic 4584 of 4729
Post > Topic >>

Re: int 0x13 utility

by =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7NuaW1v?= <spamtrap@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 29, 2008 at 02:36 PM

Dirk Wolfgang Glomp wrote:
>>> But if you write your own HD-driver, the physical CHS-limit is:
>>> 16 heads, 255 sectors, 65536 tracks(cylinders), and this gives
>>> us 267386880 sectors (= 127.5 GB).
>>> So if the the hardware can handle it then it works almost like LBA28
>>> (max= 128 GB), ...except for the unconvenient calculation needs.
>> But is this a DOS or a BIOS level driver?
> 
> If you write the driver for DOS it´s a DOS-driver, else if you write
> it for your own OS maybe you can call it BIOS-driver?

Nop. But I don't know whether DOS can have it's own drivers to control
HDs.
DOS usually calls the BIOS, so one can replace the BIOS HD driver and have
DOS call it, thinking it's the original BIOS driver.

Did you understand, or need more explaining?

JJ
 




 57 Posts in Topic:
int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-22 15:30:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
dave <spamtrap@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 16:27:30 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-23 08:45:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-23 08:37:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Hendrik van der Heijden   2008-03-24 14:50:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-24 21:15:00 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Rugxulo <spamtrap@[EM  2008-03-25 01:11:15 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-25 13:57:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"H. Peter Anvin"  2008-03-28 15:59:06 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-28 20:07:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-29 23:04:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 00:47:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-30 15:45:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-30 17:31:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:38 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-03-31 19:18:36 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:13:27 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-31 03:32:05 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Red Rooster <spamtrap  2008-04-01 17:03:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-05 08:02:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-05 18:52:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-04-05 20:13:01 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-06 10:19:57 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:11:21 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:15:08 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 02:38:35 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-26 13:53:39 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:39:22 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-27 07:41:53 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 14:36:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <  2008-03-29 21:05:34 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 13:25:19 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-27 09:00:59 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-29 15:07:31 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Wolfgang Kern"  2008-03-30 13:53:33 
Re: int 0x13 utility
NoSpam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-31 13:06:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Tim Roberts <spamtrap  2008-04-01 03:21:14 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-25 17:22:43 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-26 07:57:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
=?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gSmVyw7N  2008-03-26 23:36:04 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-27 10:15:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 00:23:24 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-03-31 09:22:44 
Re: int 0x13 utility
"Rod Pemberton"  2008-03-31 15:17:48 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-01 08:31:58 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:00:41 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail803NOSPAM <s  2008-04-01 04:07:45 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-02 08:57:03 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-02 20:03:49 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-03 22:11:23 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-03 23:11:29 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 08:33:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 12:58:10 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Spiro Trikaliotis <sp  2008-04-06 11:34:12 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-06 18:02:51 
Re: int 0x13 utility
Alex Buell <spamtrap@  2008-04-04 21:04:11 
Re: int 0x13 utility
ArarghMail804NOSPAM <s  2008-04-04 21:31:33 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 15:19:51 CDT 2008.