Terence wrote:
....
>>> It's an interesting syntax, but even if registers are interchangeable
>>> in usage, it is far easier to have a named reference than a numbered
>>> reference, so I propose to quickly write a to-from parser between my
>>> preferred ASM reference usage and the rn, sn syntax
>> Good idea, but be aware to find some different interpretations of
>> register-numbers.
>> ie: Herbert uses a functional logic for ordering: eax,edx,..
>> while I use the given opcode-patterns: eax,ecx,edx... to match PUSHAD
> Ouch!
> Good thing you said that, it explains why r1 ~ BX wasn't behaving like
> I thought it should..
> Ah! Assumptions..
This names wont follow the alphabet, perhaps just because this
registers may have got different birth-dates ... :)
the bit addresses are:
0 A ccu
1 C ount
2 D ata
3 B ase
4 S tack P tr
5 B ase P tr
6 S ource I ndex
7 D estination I ndex
__
wolfgang
|
