On Mar 4, 3:05 am, "H. Peter Anvin" <spamt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Frank Kotler wrote:
>
> > I can't duplicate this, either. Ndisasm will produce some very
puzzling
> > results if you don't "do it right", but I'd expect what you've done to
> > work! I've used a *lot* of versions of nasm/ndisasm, and never seen it
> > do *that*, exactly...
>
> This was a bug in 2.00, it's fixed now.
>
> -hpa
Thanks all for your reply.
I have replied yesterday, but it might be sent failure...
My test version is 2.00, after I post this message, I downloaded the
2.02. the same code, the same OS, and the same commond, but I got a
different output from ndisasm. It it all right now.
So I think, it might be a little bug of vrsion 2.00.
Thank you all once again!...o(_$B"A_(B__$B"A_(B)o...
|
