=?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Can=27t_live_without=85?=

On May 5, 9:03 am, AAsk <AA2e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "One lone APLer could in many cases replace 10-20 applications
> programmers..."
>
> Another viewpoint on the same scenario is that "one lone APLer
> introduces a single point of failure in the orgnisation" and no
> organisation will chose to live with this kind of vulnerability.
> Organisations exist to make a profit and the strongest influence on
> profit is their expenses: can you seriously believe that they spend
> 10-20 times more ( I am assuming that the APLer gets paid t he same as
> the orhers!) for the same end product?

And now throw in the next usual misconception, that it will be
impossible to hire a replacement.  Not that she would be better or
worse, but that it would be impossible to hire anyone at all.