On May 2, 10:48=A0am, AAsk <AA2e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Thank you for confirming that MOM objects are persistent & for the
> Lescasse link giving an example of MON.
>
> It is unlikely that APL2000 will deprecate MOM (it probably has got a
> legacy by now that makes this impossible).
>
> However, JSON is making rapid in roads in the maintream world,
> particularly, AJAX. Although it is simpler XML (and not as powerful as
> XML), JSON has a growing band of followers and the XML crowd are
> conspicuously silent about the rapid acceptance of JSON. Even
> Microsoft makes concessions to this in its .NET world.
>
> The concept already exists in the .NET world, as Anonymous Types in C#
> 3.0. I expect this will be integrate seamlessly into an APL
> environment such as Visual APL (the next version, for Visual Studio
> 2008).
>
> Will you write up about MOM for Vector?
No. I think it is a bit premature. Why? Because I have just stared
incor****ating one of its features into my application; I am not ready
to advise others to invest their time. Remember, I posted the question
which basically was =93Is anyone using MOM?=94 because I was looking for
information on MOM.
As a suggestion, maybe Vector could start a new section =93Emails of
Interest=94 and post ours and other exchanges. Since all of the messages
are public the writer of the exchanges cannot object and, since this
will advertise the site, I assume Google would give their OK.
RE: JSON
Thanks for setting me straight. With your information and a little
research I now know what JSON is. I was giving APL2000 too much
credit. I thought they created the term =91JSON=92.
|
