Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Apl > Re: The questio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 9 of 26 Topic 952 of 1081
Post > Topic >>

Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter?

by Bob Armstrong <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 6, 2008 at 02:09 PM

On Feb 6, 3:22 am, "jk" <*a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (remove the asterisks)>
wrote:
> Wildebeest indeed. I remember the recommended console for programming K:
GNU's
> Emacs, using 8 of full Mb's, while the entire K  would do with <200Kb

 I have a thing about programming within the system's own facilities
so I created my IPE , IDE , whatever in K's windows themselves . You
can download my old system , unsup****ted , at
http://cosy.com/K/CoSy/membs/
.. I still use and will continue to use my K environment at least thru
the next tax cycle .
 




 26 Posts in Topic:
The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter?
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-05 09:29:00 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-05 09:51:53 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
"jk" <*axy*@  2008-02-05 19:17:43 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-05 14:48:10 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
gavino <gavcomedy@[EMA  2008-02-05 14:48:27 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
rbe <bernecky@[EMAIL P  2008-02-05 15:55:37 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Phil Last <phil.last@[  2008-02-06 00:24:58 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
"jk" <*axy*@  2008-02-06 11:22:09 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Bob Armstrong <bob@[EM  2008-02-06 14:09:14 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Bob Armstrong <bob@[EM  2008-02-06 14:24:07 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jimmy Miller <CaptainT  2008-02-23 16:45:18 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-24 02:13:26 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jane Sullivan <jane@[E  2008-02-24 10:50:00 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jane Sullivan <jane@[E  2008-02-24 10:54:27 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jimmy Miller <CaptainT  2008-02-24 04:55:32 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jimmy Miller <CaptainT  2008-02-24 04:56:25 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-24 08:05:44 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jimmy Miller <CaptainT  2008-02-24 10:32:15 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-24 11:31:43 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Jimmy Miller <CaptainT  2008-02-24 12:05:26 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-24 13:46:56 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
neitzel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-26 00:34:38 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-26 02:40:19 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Morten Kromberg <mkrom  2008-02-26 02:56:54 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
Gosi <gosinn@[EMAIL PR  2008-02-26 05:31:03 
Re: The question was: why is there no GPL or BSD APL interpreter
MikeJ <nialsys@[EMAIL   2008-02-27 12:48:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 15:04:46 CDT 2008.