On 30 Kwi, 17:20, Adam Beneschan <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I suspect that Randy was talking only about anonymous access-to-object
> parameters.
Then I don't really see what kind of "rotten" design they could
possibly sup****t.
The only do***ented use for them in Ada that I've seen was to simplify
the definition of List_Node-like records. Looks like a reasonable
rationalization. What are the pitfalls?
> Anonymous access-to-subprogram parameters (which Ada.Containers does
> use) are a different animal altogether. They do serve a legitimate
> purpose
Yes - I was afraid that this legitimate use was considered harmful.
> [Apologies if this is a duplicate post... Google Groups, which is
> apparently written in C++, was not behaving right...]
If we are already trolling, then some correction is in order here. As
far as I know, Google Groups was written in Java and indeed is a crap
(I'm using it as well). When it comes to C++, however, then as far as
I know, it was used for the search engine, which not only works
perfectly and blazing fast, but actually allowed Google to become what
they are - the IT giant - to the point where they can later write
crappy newsgroups system in Java and it's still OK because everybody
uses it anyway. Oh well... ;-)
--
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
|
