Re: using an Ada.Container as a private type

Graham <graham.stark@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

> Good question. The intention was not to derive from Map at all: I
> simply wanted to keep the fact that it was implemented as a Map
> private. Is there a better way of doing that,...

You could say:

    type Payment_Stream is
        record
            M : Payment_Stream_Package.Map;
        end record;

which might be better, depending on what you want.

>... or is keeping it private
> overdesign?

No.

- Bob