Re: Announcement: GNAT ****ted to LLVM

by "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 27, 2008 at 06:25 PM

baldrick wrote:

>> I thought that -gnatN was even more aggressive than -gnatn.
> 
> My understanding is that -gnatN was essentially a workaround for
> various historical limitations of the gcc inliner, most of which
> no longer exist.  I've been told by ACT that -gnatN is deprecated
> on the x86.  Personally I never bother with it.

Good to know.

9 Posts in Topic:

Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM

baldrick <baldrick@[EM

2008-03-23 15:05:59

Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM

Samuel Tardieu <sam@[E

2008-03-24 10:25:16

Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM

baldrick <baldrick@[EM

2008-03-24 11:09:26

Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM

Gene <gene.ressler@[EM