Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Ada > Re: Differences...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 5608 of 5931
Post > Topic >>

Re: Differences with/without .all

by Adam Beneschan <adam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 18, 2008 at 08:35 AM

On Mar 17, 3:51 pm, I <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> [The main reason for 6.4(8) is: Suppose "Func" denotes an access-to-
> function type.

A bit sloppy of me... of course I meant "a value of an access-to-
function type".

                                 -- Adam

> If you say Func(param,param,param), this results in an
> implicit dereference of Func, and a call to the function pointed to by
> Func.  But you cannot get a call to the function pointed to by Func if
> there is no parameter list, even if the function type doesn't have any
> parameters, or all parameters have defaults.  You must to say Func.all
> in that case.]
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Differences with/without .all
"Alex R. Mosteo"  2008-03-17 17:34:55 
Re: Differences with/without .all
"Randy Brukardt"  2008-03-17 15:42:30 
Re: Differences with/without .all
Ludovic Brenta <ludovi  2008-03-17 21:44:24 
Re: Differences with/without .all
Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@  2008-03-17 14:17:36 
Re: Differences with/without .all
Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh  2008-03-17 22:21:18 
Re: Differences with/without .all
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-03-17 15:51:34 
Re: Differences with/without .all
Adam Beneschan <adam@[  2008-03-18 08:35:47 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Oct 15 22:28:23 CDT 2008.