Re: Endian-problem/bug with system.bit_ops (gnat3.15)...

Niklas Holsti wrote:
> Did you have a question to ask, or did you just want to re****t this
> problem and your solution?
Since the problem is solved by including all 32bits the posting is 
not really a question - maybe the posting will give someone else, 
encountering the same problem, a hint what to look out for...

> I think that your program could be made more ****table by avoiding
> 'Address (and, of course, System.Bit_Ops) and using instead modular
> types (not available in Ada83) and their predefined bitwise "and"
> and "or" operations.
Do you have an estimation on performance? The current code 
is quite fast in emulating the vintage processor (more than 
3.5MIPS in the simulation) using the non ****table System.Bit_Ops...

   Thanks and best regards,

       Erik.