Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Compilers > Re: Progress in...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 4 Topic 2364 of 2472
Post > Topic >>

Re: Progress in instruction scheduling?

by Sid Touati <SidTouati@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 11:18 AM

> There is some recent work on optimal scheduling which compares with
> the list scheduling heuristic.  The problem is that the list scheduler
> is very close to optimal and much faster than the optimal one.

Sorry to contradict you, list schedulers are  far from the optimal,
twice the optimal in extreme case...
For very small basic blocks, list schedulers are good, as any scheduling
technique.

The problem comes when considering large basic blocks, which is the most
common codes: for large basic blocks, you cannot compute optimal
instruction schedules easily (because it is an NP-complete problem), so
you cannot compare list schedulers to optimal schedulers.

S.T.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Progress in instruction scheduling?
Stephan Ceram <linuxka  2008-03-17 21:10:18 
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling?
"=?UTF-8?B?IO+7i++7p  2008-03-18 10:54:17 
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling?
Ivan Boldyrev <boldyre  2008-03-19 12:09:05 
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling?
Sid Touati <SidTouati@  2008-04-22 11:18:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Jul 23 23:58:52 CDT 2008.