Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Compilers > Re: Bootstrapin...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 19 Topic 2388 of 2472
Post > Topic >>

Re: Bootstraping compilers ?

by pocm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paulo Jorge de O. C. de Matos) Apr 22, 2008 at 12:07 AM

Chris Hills <chris@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> However once you have written a C99 compiler (using C95) you can then
> write a C99 compiler and compile it with itself (after the first
> compilation using the C99 compiler written in C95)

Thanks you all for your replies.  Chris, this is making me
confused. Does your quote mean that I would have to write two
compilers? One compiler in C95 and one in C99?  So the first would
accept C99, the second in C99 is then fed into the first?

If writing one compiler means loads of work, although the second if
probably much easier it would still means lots of hours... or is there
something I am missing?

Cheers,
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ECS
University of Southampton, UK
[I expect he meant that you'd have to adjust your source code to be C99
compliant before feeding it to your C99 compiler.  The two versions of
C aren't very different, so I wouldn't think it would be a large effort.
-John]
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
Bootstraping compilers ?
pocm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-16 22:30:21 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Chris Hills <chris@[EM  2008-04-18 11:45:12 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
pocm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-22 00:07:22 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
David Spencer <spencer  2008-04-22 16:05:51 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Hans-Peter Diettrich <  2008-04-22 20:07:33 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roland_Lei  2008-04-18 07:32:18 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-04-18 19:32:59 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
"Damian Thomas"  2008-04-18 08:46:51 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-04-18 19:38:29 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
"Christopher Glaeser  2008-04-19 23:42:06 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Greg Lindahl <lindahl@  2008-04-18 14:13:55 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 10:35:52 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
Hans-Peter Diettrich <  2008-04-21 20:22:33 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-04-21 21:18:53 
Re: Bootstraping compilers ?
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-04-23 00:47:23 
Re: Fortran H, was Bootstraping compilers ?
"Comp.compilers"  2008-04-23 21:15:42 
Re: Fortran H, was Bootstraping compilers ?
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_K  2008-04-24 17:59:13 
Re: Fortran H, was Bootstraping compilers ?
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-04-25 12:57:11 
Re: Fortran H, was Bootstraping compilers ?
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-04-24 10:07:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 14:46:12 CDT 2008.