Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Compilers > Re: localized l...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 27 Topic 2351 of 2421
Post > Topic >>

Re: localized languages, was call by name

by torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torben =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6gidius?= Mogense Mar 14, 2008 at 09:41 AM

glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:


> I have wondered about what non-english speakers think about the
> english keywords used in the usual programming languages.
>
> It might be that some use a preprocessor to replace language appropriate
> keywords, but I believe most just use the usual english words.

That seems to be the case in Denmark, at least.  There have been a few
programming languages for primary school education that used Danish
keywords, such as "Myresnak" (= "ant talk", a LOGO variant).  But
since teaching programming to school kids has gone out of fashion,
these are, AFAIK, not used anymore.

I'm not really sure using native-language keywords is a benefit, even
for kids, as the keywords usually have a slightly different (or at
least more specific) meaning than normal English usage.  I have, for
example, often found the words "object", "class" and "inheritance"
misleading and confusing.

	Torben




 27 Posts in Topic:
silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
MattR <rosing@[EMAIL P  2008-03-03 10:37:52 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Claudio Saavedra <csaa  2008-03-03 16:24:45 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2008-03-03 20:42:38 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Alex Colvin <alexc@[EM  2008-03-05 22:02:05 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Hans-Peter Diettrich <  2008-03-06 14:28:53 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-03-03 12:12:28 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Hans Aberg <haberg_200  2008-03-03 22:10:19 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Marco van de Voort <ma  2008-03-03 22:23:48 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-03-04 03:06:11 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
wclodius@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-04 20:25:54 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
wclodius@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-05 20:06:38 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
anw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (A  2008-03-07 01:18:09 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-07 09:32:16 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Hans-Peter Diettrich <  2008-03-09 20:16:38 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-03-10 14:39:21 
Re: localized keywords, was call by name
Hans-Peter Diettrich <  2008-03-14 04:27:31 
Re: localized keywords, was call by name
"Dmitry A. Kazakov&q  2008-03-14 18:53:32 
Re: localized languages, was call by name
"Aleksey Demakov&quo  2008-03-14 12:26:59 
Re: localized languages, was call by name
torbenm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-14 09:41:57 
Re: localized languages, was call by name
"Derek M. Jones"  2008-03-15 11:51:55 
Re: localized languages, was call by name
Alex Colvin <alexc@[EM  2008-03-14 22:22:20 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Carl Barron <cbarron41  2008-03-10 19:37:16 
Re: algol60 history, was call by name
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-03-14 00:16:14 
Re: call by name, was silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
wclodius@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-03-10 19:50:56 
Re: algol, was call by name
Louis Krupp <lkrupp@[E  2008-03-15 17:38:17 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Tony Finch <dot@[EMAIL  2008-03-04 14:20:02 
Re: silly question: prefix vs postfix ops
Ralph Boland <rpboland  2008-03-04 17:59:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri May 16 21:27:29 CDT 2008.